India’s Budgetary Gimmicks

Many times I fail to understand why I and many Indians keep waiting so eagerly to watch and hear the annual ritual of the Government’s presentation of the country’s budget. It hardly helps any honest individual. Let us look at this budget. As the first reaction, Pranab has given some concession in personal taxes, somewhat higher for senior citizen. But on closer analysis, it gives only Rs 900 to Rs 2000 extra per month in hand. With present high cost of everything that one likes to possess or get, be it an appliance or service, rising aspirations and rising real inflation rate of every commodity required for day-to-day consumption, this additional money in hand hardly worth having so much of excitement for the budget.

The government keeps on selling dreams and promises, and hardly fulfills any, but stills the vote banks remain mesmerized. UPA rather more specifically Congress has learnt the tricks to keep the real vote bank, be it the farmers and Dalits, be it students and salaried class happy with promises and offers to sustain their support. It has started doing that from the first day of the second term. Be it Railway Budget or the General, the main mission appears to be the same with the rhetoric such as the preference of ‘social viability’ over ‘economic viability’ in the first one and inclusive growth and concern for aam aadami in the second. I wonder while the taxpayers of the country keep on raising the revenues and GDP to trillion level, the few so-called democratically elected persons through its bureaucracy keep on misusing the revenue in so ineffective ways. And the whole country keeps on watching. One feels proud to see the amount of money what India will spend in just one year, but gets morose after realizing that the most of the money will not go to the deprived beneficiaries with 90-95 percent as leakage loss and only the middlemen get benefited.

I shall remember this budget day for some time. I finished my morning chores and got ready by ten minutes to eleven in the morning to sit near TV to hear Pranab Babu. But then the power went off. And I kept on cursing everyone for half an hour. Why should I get excited for the budget speech when the country’s governments had not been able to provide this one basic necessity over the years?

I feel like expressing one more opinion about the perceived difficult task of preparing the annual budget, though the intellectuals may not like it. If one compares the speeches of the last few years, it doesn’t appear to be so arduous a task. Anyone, even Sibu Soren or Mayawati can do the same what Pranab babu did or Chidambaram was doing with safe jugglery of the previous budget speeches.

Congress have been great with promises and pronouncement that allure the people but proved itself as very poor in real performance, be it power or road, be it education or healthcare services for the people of the country. Just as one example, I refer to a good act of the government. It allocates Rs 100 crore for an institute of excellence in budget every year. Why doesn’t it give a mission to the institute to get into the world ranking of educational institutes in next five years?

I hope the government change its priorities and judge its fund allocation with real results in understandable terms and units. I wish the people of India would have been judging the governments also by these performances.

Will the government build at least 24,000 kms of roads of world class during its effective tenure based on the promise of building 20 km every day and considering just 300 days and that too for four years?

Will it complete the task of providing the multi-utility ID card to each citizen within three years that it has promised?

Will it provide the broad band connectivity to every village that it has promised?

Will it meet the target of the addition of 78,000 MW power generations by 2012 (or 65,000 MW by 2014that it has promised in president address to the joint session of parliament?

If the government can’t implement on its promises, what is the fun of making a billion look helpless and perpetually as fools in hope?

Posted in economy, governance | Leave a comment

Bihar: What Should I Celebrate?

It has been my way of enjoying life at this age when I hardly do anything.

A telephone call from my home town of Sasaram excited me. Golu was the creator of the news of excitement. Golu is son of Ramesh, my cousin from maternal side and the eldest son of my most respected maternal uncle. Golu got qualified to go into IIT and he got placed at rank 209. Unfortunately, Ramesh though a master in science, is just marginally employed.

But then a well-done story giving the background of some of the star candidates of Anand appears in the national news magazine. Most of them are from the very low earning families, but interested in making a mark. Anand the mathematician, magician, humanist, or all in one facilitated them to get into coveted IITs. And he is doing that year after year. I don’t know why he didn’t aspire to become as rich as many running the coaching enterprises in every small and big towns of India, Kota being the most famous. Anand today has become global known celebrity? Is Anand not a good candidate for Padma award? Should Bihar not be proud of Anand and Avayanand, the IPS who parted last year? Avayanand has been now doing the similar coaching for the student of the minority in Bihar through Ahamadia foundation.

Bihar has been known only for the wrong things, be it for Lulu’s funny acts, the kidnapping industry, or corrupt and inefficient officers. But here was an officer who has created history of a sort. Pratyaya Amrit heads a state enterprise, the Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Limited (BRPNNL) that is creating record as PSU. BRPNNL completed 336 bridges in the last three years alone. It was a great performance as the Nigam had constructed 314 bridges during 30 years. Pratyaya is running the Nigam as one of the best CEOs runs with all the management practices employed these days to motivate the employees to perform the best. Why can’t the other IAS take some lessons from Pratyaya? Why do most of them make accumulating money as the only mission of the life? Pratyaya can make anyone proud with his performance.

But how can I forget to mention about the Haryana-cadre IAS officer Ajit Joshi, coming from the state of Maharashtra of Raj Thackray. Joshi inspired the people of Sonepat, a district know for their miserly ways and raised Rs 1.4 crore as donations to rebuild a Koshi-ravaged village populated by the extreme backward community of Musahars (rat-eaters). Why can Raj and others who spread divisive hatred among the Indians get some lessons from Ajit?

And then I also come across the news of Nitish taking lead over rivals to perpetuate his rule through one of the master strokes for which he has become famous. How can his decision for the reservation in the state judiciary be push the state above other state? How long Nitish can keep on blaming Lalu’s misrule for the ranking of Bihar among the miserable states? Nitish is certainly relatively better. But couldn’t he do much more on development? Should I celebrate Nitish’s reservation in state judiciary? Will it help any way to alleviate the miserable conditions of the deprived lots of Bihar?

And instead of asking Mamta to probe into the performance of railways when Lalu was at the helm, Nitish would have requested Mamta to proceed fast with the two mega projects of railways in Chhapra and Madhepura that as per media report Mamta wishes to shift to West Bengal.

Nitish could have done much more on education front- by asking the principals of the colleges of engineering, medicine and science to scale up and to improve brand image and ranking to attract students, by making school teachers more accountable, by trying to set up engineering colleges in every district headquarters and ITIs or polytechnics in every block for skill building, and by switching over to CBSE and dropping the state boards and deploying its employees as teachers.

It is unfortunate that Nitish has neither been able to attract any major business house, nor done anything significant in the area of food processing sector or even tourism, textile related sector such as ones in Madhubani and Bhagalpur.

I don’t know what has happened to Nalanda International University Project.

I again say Nitish is doing good work but something remarkable that can change Bihar pretty soon. I will have to keep on celebrating the successes of the individuals, courtesy reporter such as Amitava Srivastava.

Posted in bihar | Leave a comment

Cat Comes to India

Images of Cat


Tata Motors first acquired and finally brought in the British icons Jaguar and Land Rover (JLR) for Indian market. It is nostalgically historic moment for Tata as well as for all Indians. JLR is owned by an Indian company. My excitement has a different reason. I had visited the Jaguar factory in Coventry in 1982.


Interestingly as reported, ‘Tata Motors reported on Friday its first annual loss in at least eight years, hit by slowing demand and losses at its Jaguar and Land Rover unit it bought in 2008’. It is because of the global meltdown that has affected the western world in the worst way, and that was the JLR’s best market. Interestingly JLR has increased its sales in Russia and China even with the crisis world over in auto sector.

Many a time, I keep on asking if India can become a world power in automobiles, particularly passenger cars. Today Tata Motors is the only major Indian player. Tata Motors was late comer in passenger cars. Tata Motors tried to push its first real passenger car ‘Indica’ in markets outside but it has hardly succeeded. However, the acquisition of JLR has certainly given hope for Tata Motors, as its product range has gone wider starting from to Nano to big cat Jaguar i.e. from micro-priced cars to one among the highly priced luxury ones.

Nano could push Tata Motors as globally recognized car manufacturer. Its preproduction launches in the auto expos of developed country got exciting reviews. With the potential of its very high fuel efficiency and better emission control, it can take Tata Motors to its height.

I am sure one day even JLR will outsource major manufacturing to low-cost India without affecting its brand. And Tata Motors will focus on getting higher in its quality ranking.

Tata Motors has today all the resources including R&D centres and can afford to build the best to maintain and move to global class. Its JLR vehicles are gas guzzlers. It will need some breakthroughs in technologies or switch over to better high breed technologies to compete with global players such as Toyota and BMW.

Somehow, I think Tata motors must promote younger leadership to plan the future products and run its operation rather than depending on superannuating heads who have already reached the plateau. However, it is for Ratan to decide.

Posted in industry, manufacturing | Tagged | Leave a comment

BJP’s Self-damaging Opposition to Education Reform

BJP has started with a wrong step. Why should BJP president depute Murli Manohar for reacting to the 100 day plan of Sibal, the education minister? Does he not know that Murli Manohar was hated in academic circle? Why can’t Rajnath call some eminent educationists with some soft corner for BJP along with core group of the party and take their opinion before letting the views of the party on such important issue? BJP must master the system of collective governance. Let an individual not be allowed to present his own ideas as party’s view.

The opposition of education reform for just opposition shake will be self damaging for BJP and perhaps disenchant its middle class well-wishers who were at one time their important vote banks too. It will be as fatal as its opposition to Indo-US Nuclear Treaty.

Former human resource development minister Murli Manohar Joshi dubbed ‘the UPA’s 100-day education agenda a rushed recipe for disaster and pro-rich. Let BJP not get transformed into the leftist mindset. I am also sure that whatever Murli Manohar stated is not the views of all the leaders of BJP. Otherwise how could Gujarat come out in favour of Sibal’s views within so short a time?

Sibal’s proposals are worth positive considerations and must get all the best inputs from all who can contribute to refine for universal acceptability.

BJP must point to the weaknesses in primary and secondary education in rural India-its infrastructure, its teachers, and its management. It would have come out with the ideas and ways to improve the effective enrolment to 100%, dropouts till class XII to zero, enhanced accountability and involvement of the teachers. It is only in rural India that are having maximum of the schools that are only primary, middle or secondary. Very few have all classes from nursery to class XII as it is in most of the schools in metros. Most of the students in rural India will have to sit for the board examination even after class X. The rural school will hardly have the benefits of accreditation as with single school there will hardly be choice, unless many small entrepreneurs or self employed young persons come for teaching at affordable cost.

BJP as opposition and media must doubt over Sibal’s promise to connect every rural school with broadband, and to effectively use it for providing the quality education to the children and if the school infrastructure with single teacher, and poor building with no electricity can make it happen. Can Man Mohan Singh find another Nandan Nilekani for making this happen?

I wrote once to CM, Bihar to abolish the state boards and let every school switch over to CBSE courses. Most of the state boards remain out of date about the changes required for keeping the standard competitive. Simultaneously, the boards and its employees are only extra financial burden on the state’s finance, besides making state education corrupt and transforming the teachers as union leaders or ghosts. How can the teaching requirement of a region be different to maintain its identity? Why should even the books and teaching curricula of science subjects and English be different?

Will BJP oppose the bill on the right of free education to every child, entry of private schools in villages, or accreditation of the schools? Why doesn’t it demand additionally for compulsory and intensive training and refreshment courses for every teacher in rural India and government schools? Will BJP oppose the law to prevent and punish malpractices such as donation or capitation fees too?

Will BJP block the entry of foreign universities too in India and allow the outflow of students for no good reasons? Instead why should it not press for allowing only globally highly ranked universities from all over the world?

I wish BJP to come out with positive gestures at least on education reforms with a clear thinking arrived at with its brain pool on education rather than allowing the old physicist to talk his notions on education. Let BJP know the nation what it wants, as the people of the country will like to know BJP’s course of action on education reforms.

Let BJP be more prudent in approach as responsible opposition.

Posted in education, indian politics | Leave a comment

Bihar: Politically Deprived State

Perhaps very few people may remember that the first IIT got shifted to Kharagpur in West Bengal from the proposed location in Bihar because Dr. BC Roy wished so. Dr. Roy got it as he was nearer to Nehru than Shribabu of Bihar,

A news report reminded me of the above historical fact. The news is shocking for Bihar. Many in Bihar might have political animosity and differences with Lalu. However, Lalu as railway minister in last UPA government got two huge railway projects with investments of around Rs 30,000 crore- a diesel locomotive factory at Chhapra and an electric locomotive factory at Madhepura. It would have brought prosperity for the common people in the region. Siemens AG and US-based conglomerate General Electric Co. (GE) were expected to execute the two projects. If properly executed, the projects could have resulted in number of manufacturing clusters for various categories of components.

According to many reports in media, the new railway ministry, under a new head is considering to shift the projects to West Bengal. Mamata with eye on the next assembly election may do that without going for any rationale or ethics that are always the causalities in political decisions.

But should the projects be shifted with change in the government and ministers? Should not Man Mohan Singh or Sonia Gandhi stop Mamata from doing this injustice to the people of Bihar? And naturally, the next question is to be answered by the representatives and, if necessary the people of Bihar? Will they allow it to happen? Would not Nitish Kumar protest forcefully?

It is unfortunate that in last 62 years that have seen a large contingent of eminent persons from Bihar holding the charge of various ministries in central cabinet ministers, but hardly any, be it Dr. Rajendra Prasad, Jagjivan Ram or her daughter Meira, LN Misra, or even Nitish could bring in some projects of significance for the Bihar. Were they afraid of getting bad name for showing regional interest or too busy in their own selfish interests? Did they lack the missionary zeal or right knowledge to take the state ahead in competition? Did not the state and its people suffer for their ineffectiveness and inefficiencies?

And finally in an appeal to Lalu, I request him to have his street protests in Delhi or Kolkata to get the transfer of the projects stopped.

If not the politicians, the people and student community of Bihar must take up this issue united and forcefully, and prove that they can launch some useful movements too.

PS: If any one has something to add or even wishes to disagree, please write to me. If I am wrong anywhere, I wish to be corrected.

Posted in bihar, indian politics | Leave a comment

Tata Motors’ Nano and Apple’s iPhone

Nano has been a benchmark of India’s innovative strength. Some called it as ‘triumph of Indian ingenuity’. The launch made waves across the automobile crazy population worldwide to a certain extent similar to what Apple’s product announcements make. As reported, Apple sold over one million iPhone 3GS models through June 21, the third day after its launch. I compared Nano with Apple’s iPhone as both were very innovative products with a good number of new patents going in it. Both are priced low for all pockets and both are contemporary too.

I think Nano had a potential to sell a million, if production strategies would have been sound along with a confidence about its quality level and robustness of design. Tata Motors missed the chance. I don’t say it would have been easy but I am sure with managerial excellence that Tatas can afford to possess, it could be certainly possible.

As reported in media, the wait for Tata Motors’ Nano will end soon. Tata Motors has decided on its 1.50,000 customers who are the luckiest to get the delivery starting July at the price promised. Interestingly, the company is not only intimating the perspectives buyers through personal mails, but it has also put their names on its website. But Tata Motors will take a year and half to meet this commitment. Why should Tata Motors take so long to meet the demand of the waiting customers?

Many a times I fail to understand why Tata Motors can’t scale up the production if the product designs and component development are really freezed. Mamata certainly created the mess, but there again Tata Motors had failed as it would have kept the backup plan ready. But let us forget that.

Once Tata Motors decided to assemble Nano at Rudrapur plant, it could have got over the constraints faster. Perhaps one of the reasons in the failure to scaling up was Tata Motors’ getting into a number of products- popular ACE, global truck, and competitive SUV simultaneously.

One sure way is to cut the learning time and run all seven days and all three shifts. May be, its vendors are equally vulnerable in raising the production volume. But my other and rather biggest apprehension is about the quality of Nano and the confidence level of the engineers and manufacturers associated with that in Tata Motors. Let Tata Motors come out publicly on that and let the people know its constraint. May be, the users can provide the solutions to its constraints.

But keeping the customers waiting can never be a good management practice. And now I feel like concluding that as a traditional Indian practice, Tata Motors was never ambitious enough plans for Nano that could see it selling a million Nanos in a year. Every now and then media keep Nano in news. One related to making it more fuel efficient with micro-hybrid technology. Insiders say Tata has already started asking his senior executives, ‘What is the next Nano?’

But I keep on thinking why Nano couldn’t reach a million customers.

Posted in industry, manufacturing | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Noida: My City

Images Noida

According a survey based on some forty measures published in the latest issue of ‘Business Today’, Noida ranks sixth among the best cities of India and above the coveted Bangalore and Pune.

On the criteria for ‘Life at work’ Noida ranks number 2 with per capita income at Rs 85,519 per annum (9th rank) and employment growth rate of 14%. However, based on the parameters deciding ‘Life after work’, Noida ranked 22. About 95% of the Noidites live in their own houses (4Th highest).

On education front, Noida is pretty ahead. Educational institutes, public schools for upto class 12 and some with ‘International’ as part of the name are many. Hospitals calling themselves research institutes are also many. The highest number of seats for MBA and Engineering per capita are in Noida. Greater Noida is an education hub besides many in Ghaziabad and all along NH-24. Noida is pretty religious with temples or shrines of all sects and communities.

Surprisingly, Noida also has one of the worst literacy rates. Neither NGOs nor the corporate houses in Noida have done anything to see that all the children of temporary and migratory workers attend schools. With one of the most affluent population in Noida, I expected some formal or even informal education programmes for the illiterates elderly people.

According to the survey, power situation is pathetic. Nealy 50% of residents polled mentioned power cuts lasting 2-4 hours. Not a day goes without a power cut. I don’t know why the rich Noida Authority can’t build its own power plant or go aggressively for propagating clean energy such as solar among its residents.

Noida also has the reputation of being the crime capital of India with high profile murders, be it kidnapping of Adobe’s MD’s kid, Arushi murder case, or Nithari cold blood murders, kidnappings, and carjacking. None can be better to tell about that but us with three burgalry at our residence. Police is ineffective, and according to some it is one of the reasons for the high crime rates.

Noida has all potential to improve upon its rank. And some responsibilities lie with residents and Sectors’ Welfare Associations that elected. It requires only the change of mindsets at all levels. Almost all RWAs are run by people of vested interests mostly local builders.

Noida Authority (NA, the administrative body for Noida) naturally remains the main players. Unfortunately, the poll did put corruption in administration among the measures of poll. Many of my friends feel that NA might top on the measure of corruption. NA outsources most of the services of the residents to contractors of suspect characters. Naturally, it hardly bothers about the efficiency of such projects or the benefits from the projects to the residents. Perhaps the people of the country have lost the sensitivity for corruption as it has become so rampant.

However, I wish NA must engage some senior officer to look after the housekeeping and maintaining a good ambience all around. I don’t think it requires any further investment.

Can Noidites take pride in the rank of their city and contribute their own for attaining a better ranking?

Posted in economy | Leave a comment

A Letter for Pranab Babu

You for one can appreciate the pains of the middle class Indians, particularly the salaried employees. It is unfortunate that this class toils hard to take the country ahead, but gets so little in return. It keeps on giving the tax right before it takes its earning home. But at the old age, the government hardly cares of them.

>>Will you come out with some scheme for the old men of the private sector, who had paid significant amount of tax during their life time deducted right at the source by the employers? Can’t a certain percentage of the tax paid be put in some health care insurance scheme that takes care of the costly medical expenses of hospitalization and medicines at the old age? Unfortunately, either the insurance companies hardly have products covering the people above 70 years for healthcare or medication or the cost are exorbitant for the limited returns that they get on savings.

>>Develop a relation between the prices paid for the essential items for good healthy living, be it vegetables, fruits or groceries by the common people and the price paid to the farmers or the actual producers. How can the end-users keep on paying Rs 15- 20 per kg of potato and onion and for that matter for all other items of daily consumption? Why can’t the number of middlemen that are, as per information, about seven of them, be reduced? And will you disagree if I say that these middlemen get the best share of the returns and get into affluent class soon where as the producers particularly the farmers can hardly dream of that.

>>Will you please get the bank interest rate reduced by half for the aam aadami who buys small little things for improving the quality of life? Why can’t the banks cut down their operating expenditure? What is the logic of announcing huge profits and dividends by charging so high interests? If the banks in the developed countries can have so low an interest rate, why can’t the Indian banks do that when the labour cost here is so low compared to that in those countries? Why should these banks try to keep the salaries and perks for its top executive so high when the majority gets so low?

>>The argument above can also be extended to the big oil companies. Why can’t the prices of the diesel or gasoline or cooking gas be reduced even if it means reduced profits or dividend that only goes to the government? Even with all the incentive provided unfortunately, none of these companies have become the world class.

I have few more queries about the country’s finances that I find difficult to understand and assimilate:

>>Why the government keep on crying about the lack of financial resources, when the solutions are universally known. Why don’t you at least attempt to discuss and, if agreed, go by the advices of the reputed persons?

>>Why can’t you remove all tax exemptions for exports for companies and for SEZ companies that have reached a PBT (profit before tax) level of Rs 20 crores as suggested by NR Narayana Murthy of Infosys? You can certainly use his services to convince the top twenty companies in a meeting with all the CEOs? Where is he wrong when he says, ‘it is sad that even after almost 20 years of such tax exemptions for the software industry, our businessmen heading companies that make huge profits continue to lobby for continuation of such tax exemptions’. Following his suggestion further, ‘why can’t you levy income tax on dividend income earned by individuals beyond Rs 1 lakh? How can you justify businessmen receiving tens of crores of dividend income and not paying taxes while professionals and salaried people earning Rs 3 lakhs a year pay taxes in a country where 80% of the people earn less than Rs 50,000 a year?’

>>And what stops your government to disinvest that even the former disinvestment secretary Pradip Baijal suggested? According to Mr. Baijal, a successful bureaucrat of integrity, ‘sale of less than 5% equity has garnered more than Rs 50,000 crore. A privatizing of the entire public sector in areas where private invest is allowed now can provide the recoveries of Rs 10lakh crore. At 15,000 level, the recoveries should be of the order of Rs 50 lakh crore and even a part sale could cover more than the fiscal deficit.’

And then why can’t you cut the flab from all the government departments through rightsizing what Air India is doing to survive? The idling government employees are just eyesores and burden for the nation.

>>Finally I request you to bring a material change in the way contents of the budget are presented and make it simple enough to be understood by the aam aadami. Along with the amount allocated in Rupee term, please also mention the actual outcome such as kms of roads, MWs of power, number of schools, and number of villages, electrified. Can one day we ensure all children of the country that the lack of finance will never be the constraints for their education?

Posted in governance, indian politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Can India and U.S Move Together?

Obama discourages American companies to outsource to India, and moves towards a stringent policy of granting H-1B visas. American companies are still hesitant to collaborate on high tech products with its counterparts in India. USA keeps on hurting the Indians with the aid and support to Pakistan for buying warfare equipment to be used against India. All these raise question in the minds of Indians at large-Why can’t the most powerful democracy cooperate more visibly with the most populous democracy of the world? And there are many studies inferring that India and Indians are now helping US pretty significantly.

During the period 2004-07, the Indian industry had contributed $105 billion to the US economy and created 300,000 jobs.

The Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) and Ernst and Young have released a report titled ‘India Contributes to Employment, Capital Growth and Tax Revenues in the US: Direct Investments by Indian Companies in 2007-09’.

According to the report, in the financial years 2007-08 and 2008-09, Indian companies made 143 acquisitions across various sectors in the US. On the basis of public records and according to the values of the deals that were disclosed, India Inc has had deals worth $5,392 million during the financial years 2007-08 and 2008-09.

Indian steel producers – JSW Steel and Essar Steel – plan to ramp up production at mills in North America, which have been running at less than half the capacity.

American auto component giant Visteon’s investment bankers have approached Delhi-based auto parts major Amtek Auto for the sale of its plants and businesses. The $9.5-billion Visteon filed for Chapter 11 in May, a month after its UK units independently filed for bankruptcy after continued production cutbacks by its customers eroded the company’s financial stability. Visteon makes a whole range of components for vehicle makers, including light systems, air-conditioning systems, electronics equipment, power train control equipment and interior components.

Unfortunately, American companies didn’t take initiative to come in India in big way and preferred China because of the inefficient bureaucracies and its red tape. However when some like GE and Texas instruments took the initiatives, American industries realized what India can provide in return. However, I consider the government of the time was equally responsible.

If India grows at a rate anything above 8%, Indian market with a huge mass of consumers will force American companies to get attracted to India. I wish American politicians and bureaucrats appreciate the role that India can play on global issues. I do also wish if US could help India in checking China in the neghbourhood of India.

Will India-US relationship move to “3.0” as desired by the secretary of state?

Posted in governance | Tagged , | Leave a comment

India Inc Pushes Ahead With Green Technologies

I was extremely shore after the ministry formation for two reasons. Manmohan Singh couldn’t pick up some efficient young hardworking ministers for power as well as alternate energy. Both are complementary today and critical if the country dreams for becoming a great power. Shinde had failed to make any impression of innovative approaches to solve the serious most problem of power generation during his last inning. Shinde failed to speed up the setting up of power plants. The data on the power ministry website itself are enough to speak for his poor performance.

Power ministry has become more critical as the country must adapt the latest clean technologies discarding the traditional coal based thermal power plants. It requires integration for carbon capture and storage, CCS, for the coal based power plants.

As reported, “CCS applied to a modern conventional power plant could reduce CO2 emissions to the atmosphere by approximately 80-90% compared to a plant without CCS. However, capturing and compressing CO2 requires much energy and would increase the fuel needs of a coal-fired plant with CCS by about 25%. And it increases the cost of energy from a new power plant with CCS by 21-91%.” A bold minister can only take the right decision in the interest of the nation. It’s necessary as the government remains the main player in power generation.

Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) is rapidly emerging as one of the most promising technologies in power generation that utilizes low-quality solid and liquid fuels and is able to meet the most stringent emissions requirements.

Alternate energy ministry has been given to the most flamboyant personality of Indian politics. It requires a lot of new ideas to meet the global pressure through new and emerging technologies. India doesn’t lack resources such as sun, wind, biomass, and ocean waves or water from rivers for clean power generation. It requires the government to take proactive policy decisions to facilitate and incentivize the entrepreneurs.

Many companies in private sectors are taking initiatives for clean technologies and have plans to compete globally. Suzlon has already become a global name in wind energy business, both equipment manufacturing as well as turnkey project executions.

Tata BPSolar offers simple solar lanterns for rural households as well as complex solar photovoltaic modules for industrial applications. Moser Baer has ambition to become one of the major players in solar photovoltaic.

Tata AutoComp through a joint venture with a Japanese company GS Yuasa International manufactures green batteries using a unique composition of calcium-calcium technology replacing traditionally used hazardous antimony with calcium alloy. The technology minimizes water loss and also reduces the battery water evaporation improving thereby the battery life as well as reducing the hazardous fumes and gases.

CII is taking the lead to make the companies realize the consequences of failing to be with world communities with clean technologies. It has started Godrej Green Business Centre to help the smaller companies.

But the researches at the engineering institutes of excellence such as IITs, IISc, and the national research laboratories of CSIR, and DRDO must also participate in debugging the technologies related to alternate energy and in cutting its cost. It requires focused facilitation and encouragement from the government.

Interestingly, Mahindra and Mahindra is working hard to develop electric, hybrid and biofuel vehicles. It has already commercialized the micro-hybrid technology for lowering fuel consumption. The technology enables the engine to switch off automatically at a traffic light when idle and in neutral gear. The engine starts seamlessly once the driver presses the clutch for going ahead. M&M with IIT, Kanpur and R&D centre of IOL and Lubrizol for making its vehicle compatible with bio-diesel.

Most of the Indian companies have taken up the tsk of getting energy efficient. An interesting name is of B. Pathak. Pathak’s Sulabh is credited with developing low cost toilet technology to produce energy out of human waste.

Interestingly, the first bio-diesel shipment from Cleancities Bio-diesel India Ltd, the biggest bio-diesel plant in the country located in the Visakhapatnam special economic zone at Duvvada, was flagged off at the Vizag Port. The consignment, 9,300 tonnes of bio-diesel, was bound for Spain.

India Inc and the community of technocrats and scientists must take up the challenge and advantage of rapidly growing global market of clean and cool technologies. As estimated, $20 trillion will be invested in energy by China and India by 2030 in low carbon projects. Further, the country could expect to earn billions from selling carbon credits. That could be another source of revenue for cleantech R&D – and another source of opportunity for Indian business.

—-
A Green Revolution

Posted in economy, industry | Leave a comment