Why are Americans so bitter with its auto makers?

General Motors, once the world’s mightiest industrial enterprise have gone begging the federal government to avoid bankruptcy and its consequences. As it appears, the lawmakers are not convinced about the sincerity of the automaker as well as its capability to make the companies viable and competitive with the bailout amount. For the time being, the lawmakers have turned down the $25 billion loan request.

The nation that discarded a white American for an African American for occupying white house, is no mood to go by techno-nationalism to favour Detroit Three with a discriminatory bailout. However, the most surprising aspect of the unprecedented bailouts is the preference of the Americans for the financial companies and banks over the manufacturing units. Why does America prefer Citibank over GM? As in any enterprise or corporation, the executives taking care of finance of the country rightly or unscrupulously are controlling the destiny of the nation. US is no way different.

Perhaps Americans trust its banking industry and financial institutes more and have confidence that it can keep America at the top in the world as only superpower. It is strange that while the law makers expected GM to provide “a forthright, documented assessment” of their current operating cash position, short-term funding needs “and how they will meet the financing needs associated with the plan to ensure the companies’ long-term viability”, the Citibank gets $100 billion or three times of that without many conditions.

Automakers have been cutting down their cost. That’s why they moved operations to Canada and went all over the world to set up facilities. Even today they are cutting down the cost by reducing the so badly criticized fleet of corporate jets to minimum. They are trying to survive by selling their stakes in different affiliate and closing down the factories in US. As reported, Ford had agreed to sell 20 percent of Japanese affiliate Mazda Motor Corp., raising about $540 million. GM also has completed the $233 million sale of its 3 percent stake in Suzuki Motor Corp. GM plans to idle five plants in Ohio, Michigan, Kansas, Missouri and Ontario. But people expect an overhaul of top management including the replacement of CEOs and senior executives and drastic reduction in their remunerations and perks.

GM has also been trying to do a lot to wash away many myths from the minds of Americans at large with data and facts. Unfortunately, the myths don’t die in days. It may be the actions too late and perhaps too little too. But America and Americans, more so the management and UAW must accept the challenge and save at least GM and Ford.

UAW must realize the seriousness and make its members accept the reality by agreeing to work at compensation in line with those in competition. The technocrats and managers must ensure the products as reliable and as contemporary in design as the best from the competition. Let them produce what the consumers prefer. The American innovative instincts must find a solution to match or improve upon the fuel economy of other manufacturers. Finance managers must make the firms compete with the lowest overheads. The U.S. automakers must produce a viable turnaround plan and the government must set clear benchmarks to measure progress and facilitate the automakers to succeed rather than seeing it die.

I feel bad about the Detroit Three as I have been in this industry for the whole life. I wish Americans do not compare manufacturing with financial services and lead the industry to death. Let me profess that without these manufacturers the world can’t expect their competition to provide the breakthrough in clean fuel vehicles that it dreams of. Let the government find some answers to the wild swings between low and high fuel prices that have crippled the U.S. industry by erratically shifting buyer preferences-to and from SUVs. I fail how the government accepts a system in which the gasoline price comes down from over $4 a gallon to below $ 2 a gallon in the name of free market.

Posted in industry, management, manufacturing | Leave a comment

Innovating India and US or West

India gets a mention in all the news related to ‘the global war for innovation and talent’, be it the number of scientific and technical papers produced annually, the investment in R&D, or the world’s top science and research universities.

Among the logics behind the strong position of India in innovation, the mention of Tata Motors’ Nano is one of the most popular success stories, and then come the stories about the R&D centres established by the MNCs in India. For example, ‘some 70% of the employees in General Electric’s Bangalore Global Research Center hold masters degrees or PhDs. The 680 patents GE’s Bangalore team has filed since 2000 are critical to the company’s global innovation efforts.’

My Google News Alert for ‘R&D in India’ confirms the coming in or expansion of MNCs’ R&D activities in India almost daily. One can easily take pride in the availability of Google news in four India languages, a record of a sort, and all created in India.

Is the development going to challenge the might of the Western countries so far innovation is concerned? The right answer may be a simple ‘no’. Many management thinkers such as Amar Bhide of Princeton University or Arindam K. Bhattacharya of the Boston Consulting Group suggest that the developed world must take advantage of the rising capability of the Asians.

According to a recent column on ‘Innovation in America’ in The Economist, ‘Even before the financial crunch began, many businessmen were worried that America was losing its lead in innovation to India and China. So does the relative decline of America as a technology powerhouse really amount to a threat to its prosperity?’ The opinions differ, but certain developments are interesting and heartening. IBM plans to train as researchers exceptionally talented engineering graduates and postgraduate students in computer science from leading technical institutions in India. To encourage graduates to take up careers in research, Microsoft Research India also introduced various programs, including a two-year assistant researcher program for engineering graduates to do research work at the Microsoft lab.

Further, India has retained the first slot for the seventh year in succession with the number of Indian students in the US increasing by 13 per cent in 2007-08 to reach 94,563, according to the Open Doors report published by the Institute of International Education with support from the US Department of State’s Bureau of Education and Cultural Affairs. Many more Indian students are also going to other countries in all corners of the world too for higher education. And most of these are non-IITians enginerring graduates coming to US for Master’s and Ph.D. Mckinsey, Fareed Zakaria or Vivek Wadhawa may keep on debating about the quality of education in Indian professional institutions, but the students themselves will get over the gap of knowledge with their intense urge to compete with the best of the world.

Between 2004 and 2007, MNCs increased R&D staff by 22 percent; 91 per cent of that increase was in China and India. Companies in the US spent the largest amount on R&D in other countries, as that helps in improving its sales and profits. India was the second-largest, with $12.9 billion. Its large, English-speaking talent pool and fast-growing auto, computing and electronics, and pharmaceutical markets will stimulate further growth. Steven J Veldhoen, managing director, Asia, Booz & Company, Japan, said, “India has created a centre of excellence in automobile manufacturing, both for domestic and global demand. India is going through a development phase, where manufacturing will follow.” “India wants to catch up with China. Presently it lags behind China in both volume-based and technology-based manufacturing, though India may be ahead of China in skill-based manufacturing. India’s share in the world’s manufacturing is 1.8 per cent, while China’s share is 12 per cent. India needs to have a growth rate of 12-15 per cent on a sustained basis.”

India is the new IT research hub. From ideation and conceptualization to end-to-end designing, the entire product development cycle now happens in India. Many Indian R&D teams even have the ownership of products developed for different companies. The high-end research and development work in the Indian IT sector has started a reverse brain drain.

Interestingly many innovations are coming from grassroots. Missionaries such as Anil K Gupta of IIM- Ahmedabad are trying to get the best from the grassroots’ innovation. In a recent article in Outlook, Prof Gupta writes, “One of the largest German dental restoration technology firms (Bego.com) contacted NIF after reading about a tooth made of bamboo by Dodhi Pathak, an innovator from Assam in ’02. No Indian company ever bothered. A physics graduate from a European country thought he had come out with an original idea: magnetic shock absorbers. But after a search, he found that Kalpita Patil, a student, had already been awarded for the innovation by NIF. Similarly, Kanak Das, an innovator from Assam, developed a cycle that ran faster on uneven roads back in 2002-03: it converted energy from the shock absorbers into mechanical as well as electrical energy. In the US, a patent was applied for such a technology much later.”

All this development that may be exhilarating for Indians at large, but there has been hardly any breakthrough innovation. No scientist or technocrat working in India has got Nobel after CV Raman. And Nano might have got a lot of media attention, as the idea is certainly unique with a lot of potential for Tata Motors and many manufacturing companies in India. However, Indians are not sure if it will come out in production in the desired number and that too, fast enough to take advantage of the early arrival and be excepted by the local and then global car buyers.

Can Indians show in the coming general election some innovative way to eliminate all unscrupulous politicians that are holding back the country? Can Indians stop wasting Rs 150 crore in performing yagya to get rid of the global financial meltdown and go to establish 150 first class schools or healthcare centres out of the money?

Let us go by Jeffrey Immelt, the boss of GE, the world’s largest industrial firm. “Companies and countries that really play offence vis-à-vis technology and innovation are going to come out ahead,” he said this week at an event in New York to present GE’s coming innovations in health-care technology.

———-
PS: India’s Design Boom
TIME’s Best Inventions of 2008

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Borders after Three Years

It was fun to be in Borders again after three years. I used to spend regularly 6-7 hours in Borders during my last visit to US. As Anand goes early morning to his office, I got ready by 7AM.

Anand took me first to his new office, where I could see the unique transformation in workplace design. Anand can sit anywhere he likes. He docks his laptop, goes on line with the rest of the world. He can make any telephone his own with a simple programme, as it is an Internet-based telephone. For privacy, there are small rooms with thick glass doors. For presentation to larger group, there are halls that can be reconfigured fast as per the requirement. Toilets are eco-friendly with no water.

I had to spend half hour in Wal-Mart waiting for Borders to open at 9AM. As usual, I kept on looking at the tags giving the country of manufacture. One Wal-Mart is giving jobs for millions world over. Before entering Borders, I was afraid if it would keep me busy for 7-8 hours that will take Anand to come for picking me again. However, pretty soon I got busy and never realized the time flying. The latest journals of my interest such as the issues of Harvard Business Review, Scientific American, Popular Science, Forbes, and Fortune kept me engaged. Among the books, I glanced through the racks on ‘History’ related to India. It showcased the latest books on India including ‘India Express’ by Daniel Lak. I went through its chapter on ‘Educating India: Then and Now’. Lak has written about IIT-Kharagpur, Boddha Gaya, Rajgrih and Nalanda through Patna. I didn’t find Lak doing a good job. He hadn’t planned his trip well. Other books that I managed to look through were ‘The World is Curved’ by David M Smick. Chapter ‘Tiny Soprano Rides the Chinese Dragon’ dealing with China’s role in global economy was interesting. China appears to have awed American intellectuals and thinkers somewhere.


I have a tip for booklovers. One can use Borders or Barnes &Noble to glance through the books. If you find some interesting ones, you can buy it at just nominal cost of transportation through Amazon. For ‘Made in China’ by Donald N. Sull, I paid only $4.24.

This is one thing that I miss in Noida. Why can’t Amazon, Borders or Barnes and Noble start its operation in India? With a number of bookshops now in Sector 18, and in the malls-Wave and Great India Place, Noida appears to be a place of book lovers.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

IIMs- Where are the Gurus?

Time and again, a question crops up in mind. Why do I not come across anything worth remembering about the gurus of IIMs or other coveted management schools in India? Why do the business magazines or pink papers in India not publish their views and articles, or cover their success stories or write about their books?

Yesterday I was going through Fortune and found at least two major stories that related to management gurus of Indian origin working in US. In a report on 10 new gurus, the name of CK Prahalad got mention with Peter Drucker and Jim Collins. Rakesh Khurana is one of the 10 new gurus. Khorana is Professor of business administration, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, Mass. “Khurana has consulted for several companies about leadership, and he’s cautioned against what he calls the “irrational search for charismatic CEOs,” a misguided belief that a CEO with a magnetic personality translates to corporate success (it doesn’t).” In the same issue, the suggestions of another management guru Ram Charan with Jia Lynn Yang for Obama have appeared.He proposes:

Set a goal to get our fair share of exports and jobs in the world.

Rename it the Department of Exports and Imports and make this cabinet post as critical as Treasury or Defense. Appoint a heavyweight who gets things done. Hold the secretary accountable by requiring the department to publish its goals.

Launch a competition among the country’s top half-dozen consulting firms with a $10 million prize for creating the best plan showing us how to get ahead, region by region and sector by sector. Get them to run analyses on what other areas of the world might be receptive to our products. And have them focus on smaller, midsized companies, which have a lot of room to grow in terms of exporting more.

Examine where we need to spend more on infrastructure. Discuss priorities for highways, bridges, and airports based on hard facts and analysis. Make them transparent by publishing the results.

Devote more federal money to industrial research. Innovation creates jobs.

There are many management gurus of Indian origin working in US. Professor Bala Balachandran and Vijay Govindrajan are the other names known as management gurus in the United States. About 10% of the professors at places such as Harvard Business School, Northwestern’s Kellogg School of Business, and the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business are of Indian descent — a far higher percentage than other ethnic groups. Issues of Harvard Business Review and many publish their papers. Many have published their research work as books. I have read recently two pretty good books one by Tarun Khanna and the other one by Amar Bhide. May I request Business India, Business World or Outlook Business to come out with a special issue about the management gurus from the management schools in India for the benefits of persons like me? Will IIMs take up the researches, publications, and consultancy by the faculty members seriously? And will India Inc provide the necessary funding and sponsor the projects? Let the faculty members not be afraid of talking about the current issues of the country in media. The country needs their advices and suggestions, as Ram Charan has done it for US.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

US Big Three Bailout and Conditionality

During last week or so, the media in US is agog with two hot news items- First one relates to the possibility of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, the wife of the former president and the rival of Obama in primary getting in the Obama’s government as Secretary of state, and the second is about the desirability of bailout for automakers. Naturally, the politics is not my great interest; the debate of the bailout for Big Three certainly does.

On my morning walk that is the normal office going time for Americans, I find cars speeding towards the destinations. For Americans, the proximity of the workplace is not the top priority for selecting their house of residence with one of the cheapest oil prices, good roads, and latest cars financed so easily with plastics. Surprisingly, I see the cars of Toyota and Honda far more in number followed by other Japanese, South Korean, and European cars. I hardly find cars of American Big Three. Why is it so? Is it because of quality or price?

With my experience of Hindustan Motors that had close connection with GM, I am of opinion that American Big Three had gone creating its presence in the entire potential markets world over. But they never tried to be at the top in those markets and yielded soon to competitors. As with other sectors such as machine tools and electronics America never tried hard to remain at the top. It is just by sheer worldwide presence that GM and Ford still remains near the top. In India, GM started with HM, and Ford with M&M, but soon decided to become fully-owned companies. Neither GM nor Ford was serious to become the leader in the market and so today Suzuki and Hyundai are the main car manufacturers followed by Tata Motors. Nano may push Tata Motors ahead of the other two, but with a bad beginning at Singur, many have started doubting it. Interestingly, VW is number one in China, and Fiat in Brazil. GM and Ford may have a better position in Russia. It appears the management of the American automakers doesn’t have the fire required to reach the top and remain there. Should it not be considered as a failure of the management that is taught in all world famed schools of Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, or Princeton that are the benchmarks for other developing countries including India?

General Motors, Ford and Chrysler have been making losses and going to run out of cash to continue soon. The course left is either bailout by the federal government or going for bankruptcy before year’s end. The Big Three have asked for bridge loans of $25 billion. The alternative route to file bankruptcy may mean catastrophic economic hardships in all 50 states with automakers having 239,000 U.S. employees, 775,000 retirees and spouses and 2 million people covered by company-sponsored health care. Collapse of Detroit Three could be cataclysmic and touch more than 4 million other jobs including suppliers, dealers, car haulers and rental companies. A shut down of Detroit will mean an around 10% of the national unemployment rate .

Both the Democrats and Republicans appreciate the problem and stake involved, and so are ready to assist, but it must impose certain tough conditions.

Automakers must restructure and become viable.It must improve up on its perception about its quality, and services among the customers. It must come out with some breakthrough innovations in hybrid, fuel efficiency, or alternative fuel technologies. The government would put limits on executive compensation including a provision barring bonuses from executives whose salaries are higher than $250,000 (couldn’t even retire with lucrative “golden-parachute” compensation) and a prohibition on the payment of dividends. Automakers would also have to submit plans on how they intend to remain competitive.

The Democrats’ plan in the Senate would give automakers access to $25 billion in loans from the $700 billion Wall Street bailout program for the financial companies.

The White House and many Republicans favor amending the law approved in September to extend automakers $25 billion in technology loans to retool factories and make more fuel efficient cars.

The whole of US is divided on only the way to help, and not on the need to help.

Some doubt if the bailout will fail to reform American auto makers. Jack Welch, the legendary former CEO of GE in Business Week suggests bankruptcy reorganization. According to critics like Jim Schrager at the University of Chicago, Booth School of Business, the wrong people are in charge. Bush, whose limousine is made by GM, opposes a bailout. President-elect Barack Obama is in favour of an aid package, but not a blank check.

I fail to understand why the American administration is so generous to the financial sector but not to auto? It came out with an unprecedented bailout of $700 billion for it. It set few restrictions. As reported, some large banks were even pressured by the administration to accept money they did not need or particularly want. Is it because of the heavy budget of the companies in sector for lobbyists that influence the administration?

I do also hardly understand why there is no mention of the correction required in UAW demands that has made labor and legacy costs for American automakers highly uncompetitive. Under new contracts, hourly pay and benefits for new hires were cut to about $26, while for the old employees it amounts to about $78. GM’s health-care costs tack on $1,500 per vehicle. Toyota and Honda spend a mere $400 per vehicle at their U.S. production plants. In Japan, it’s as low as $150 per vehicle.

Why the legislators are so afraid in talking about the union that is equally responsible for the poor shape of automakers today? Why are the old workers not agreeing to have cut on wages over going to bankruptcy? Why can’t the federal government subsidize the health care cost or get negotiated to the level of other sector? Interestingly, under a labor agreement last year, the companies are required to provide $15 billion to a health care fund for retirees in January 2010 and another $15 billion in 2012. And the UAW is separately asking for $ 25 billion bailout for it.

Naturally, US auto industry is badly in need of total platform change. The country must come out with some long term strategies in many areas of operations to make manufacturing relevant for it. Will it go for a similar bail out for Boeing tomorrow or for Cisco in tech sector, if situation arises?

GM is trying to educate the people about some wrong perceptions about the US automakers. I wish Americans find time to visit the site.

I wish the US automakers use its resources such as managerial talents in BRIC countries to improve upon the domestic car business.
PS
Latest on Big Three bailout, November 18,2008
CEOs Plead

Posted in industry, management, manufacturing | Tagged | Leave a comment

Nandan Nilekani’s ‘Imagining India’

For months, I was eagerly waiting for Nandan Nilekani‘s ‘Imagining India‘. Many a times, I find myself in dilemma of answering to me only, if I am a book lover or book collector. Yamuna, my wife, as usual, thinks I only collect books, I don’t read. I confess I am not a first-page-to-last- page reader of any book. But I read essentially the interesting chapters, particularly the first and the last ones. While the first one provides a fair idea of the contents with the mission and style of the book, the last chapter provides the conclusive remarks with future trends and the relevance of the contents dealt with in the book.

I told Anand about ‘Imagining India‘ who is equally sold about books. He didn’t find it on Amazon, but then when I showed another Indian site, he helped me in ordering the book from here (USA) itself. If everything goes as we hope, I shall have it in the mails, waiting for me on my return to India.

I have some more reasons to associate myself with Nandan Nilekani. Firstly, Nilekani is also an IITian, and secondly, I had also taken the adventure in writing a book even though I was in manufacturing sector and the people around me were hardly appreciative. I did succeed in getting my book on ‘Machining Trouble shooting’ (no more in print) published through Tata-McGraw-Hill.
I don’t have any intention to compare myself with Nandan. He has gone much higher than I could. Thomas Friedman in his book ‘The World is Flat’ gives credit for the title of the book to Nandan, who was one of the founders of Infosys. Will ‘Imagining India’ make Nandan a bigger celebrity? I wish so.

Many months ago, I had read an article of Nandan, ‘Six Things That Changed India’. That was perhaps the part of his book planned. Six things are as follows:

1.Gigantic human capital: The mindset of India about population has changed from looking at it as ‘burden’ to thinking of it as human capital. It will be India’s “demographic dividend” as in the next 20 to 30 years India would “have the largest pool of young people in the world, when the rest of the world is aging.”

However, I favour certain amount of control in population as a necessity to reduce pathetic poverty levels, though not through as harsh as China’s ‘one child policy’.

2. Entrepreneurship gains acceptance: Entrepreneurs are no longer viewed with suspicion but as icons of economic growth. Today, India has the largest pool of entrepreneurial talents outside the United States. Indian entrepreneurs are not afraid of liberalization anymore and globally competitive. They are investing abroad, and are buying companies abroad.

I wish all entrepreneurs follow the Infosys track record of creating wealthy employees too.

3. The power of English: English is no longer viewed as an imperial language. More and more people, whether they are in villages or small towns, are realizing that if they really want to participate in the global economy, and they really want to bring more income to their lives, they have to learn English. And, the political system has accepted this because more and more states — which had stopped teaching English — are now going back to teaching English from class one.

I differ with Nilekani on the issue a little. It is not necessary to teach English from class one. However, I agree that our children must learn English or any other foreign language that enhances employability as the second language.

4. Change in democracy: The notion of democracy had undergone a major transformation. Today, it has gone to become a bottom-up democracy where everybody understands their democratic rights — not just in the sense of parliamentary democracy or contesting elections. You see people taking charge and doing things in India without waiting for the state to do the job. Today, India is the most thriving place in the world for NGOs.

But can the synergies of NGOs be focused to one single purpose of universalizing education in India? Is it not the one big thing that can make real difference? Can technologies rescue when teachers sleep in class or give a slip?

5. The technology revolution: Technology had catapulted India and helped it leap-frog several decades. For example, India’s entire national election was held on electoral voting machines. Today, India has the most modern stock markets in the world and they are completely electronic. Mobile phone has become accessible to everybody. With more and more applications, it causes a quantum leap in productivity and much of this has fuelled the economic growth.

Why is India not having an explosive growth with manufacturing going to huts and hamlets?

6. Globalization embraced: India had adopted a progressive view of globalization. Our companies have become globally competitive and are willing to go out and global factors are really playing in India’s favour today.

I experience every day here in US how globalization has helped Indians. Today, one can find the parents from remote villages from all over India in every part of US visiting their siblings who work here. Could it be possible without globalization?

I can’t but agree with Nilekani that “there is a lot of work ahead in really reforming and improving the quality of education — both primary and secondary. Having just a few Indian Institutes of Technology or Indian Institutes of Management is no panacea. You need to have hundreds of them, like they have in China.”

And yes we can.

PS: Read a chapter-From Bangalore One To Country One

India, By Its People

Posted in economy | Leave a comment

Stanford- A Bookstore Tells Global Ranking

Stanford is one place Anand loves to visit whenever, he gets opportunity. May be, he has a wish unfulfilled to be its students, or may it is because of his love for the bookstore in the university campus open to all that is the best that I have seen in my lifetime.

We had visited Stanford University campus twice or thrice during our visit to US in 2005 too. Aditya, the grandson of YP Singh, the only friend in Salt Lake was studying there. He did wonderfully well in CAT and got admission. However, we saw the university only from outside. Anand did not know much about the place. Anand came to know about the bookstore after Shannon came in his life. She has taken some course in the university.

It was a pleasure to go around the store after visiting the wonderful cathedral. I could then understand why this university is one of the best in the world. Why can’t India’s premier institutions such as IITs, and IIMs have bookstore of this standard that each of the great institutes such as Stanford, MIT, UC (Berkley), or Harvard are having in its campuses in US? Some private entrepreneurs such as Apeejay group that owns Oxford Book Store in Kolkata, will certainly be interested in setting up similar stores, if it is given certain incentives and space in the institutions’ premises in India.
Note: While a search for images on Google with ‘Bookstore Stanford University’ indicated 162,000 entries, the search for ‘Bookstore IIT Kharagpur’ had 3,930entries all mainly about IIT. You can yourself experience this.

I am sure that all the directors of the IITs and other institutes of excellence in India would have visited these American universities. However, I am not sure if they would have found time to go around the bookstores. Let me confirm that the bookstore will hardly require any drain on the institutes’ own resources. Will the HRD ministry create roadblock to prove its authority over the institutes if the directors invite some private entrepreneurs to do that?

Yamuna got a Stanford T-shirt from Shannon.

Posted in education | Leave a comment

Noida Hits me in Pleasanton

It’s 5AM here in Pleasanton. It must be evening in Noida. As usual, I am on my computer. The telephone rings. I don’t pick up assuming it as some marketing call. However, the message continues. My neighbor, Archana is on the other side.

Archana had gone to get my car lying outside the main door started today, as Ashok, her driver was going on leave. She found through the wire mesh on the steel gate on the main door that the doors inside are open. After sometime she informed me about a possible burglary. Burglars had opened the doors and steel almirahs of all the rooms. Materials were lying outside. What could I do? I asked her to get all the doors locked, if possible. There is no use in reporting to police. This is the third instance of thefts at my residence in Noida. Perhaps, to burglars, we are pretty rich.

They would have certainly got something useful or them. Everything can’t be put in locker. We didn’t leave anything inviting burglary. They would have considered my age and spared me. I got again a shock of life. However, how is it possible? In the huge lot of unemployed youths from all over the country in Noida, the risk would have been worth taking for some.

I don’t know if someone can help me out. It didn’t happen in earlier two cases. As usual, Yamuna keeps me blaming and I do the same. We had been going quite frequently in last five years. But nothing happened. We got complacent. Three thefts in 6years against two in six months that happened in 2003 are better statistics of law and order!

Anand suggests us to keep all the doors open. Rakesh also said the same when he came along with Alpana hearing the news. At least, it will eliminate the cost and trouble of the repair required after a burglary. This is the same India, where as per the Chinese travelers, the law and order was so good that the people never used locks.

Here in Pleasanton, Anands hardly lock anything. Sometimes, I become a little emotional, may be a little impractical too. Next time when we shall go out, we shall put a sticker saying, ‘Here are the keys. If you wish to burglar, please use them and don’t break the locks or door. Difficulties in getting the repair done in Noida are more worrisome.’ Or ‘We have kept the keys in a place near the main gate. Use your commonsense and search it. Please don’t take risk and break locks.’

But can we keep on living in Noida? Can we expect Noida to become Pleasanton?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Visit to a US Elementary School

 

It was Sunday, October 19. Alpana and Rakesh had invited us to join them in a carnival with their kids. Montair Elementary School, the public school of Keshav and Anvita in San Ramon had organized it for fund raising as mission. Rakesh said, ‘a middle class Americans can’t afford private school in US’. For those in India whose children are in US keep on boasting about their salaries in US converted in Indian currency. But that fat salaries can’t buy a good school for their own children. Is it not surprising? As I understand, almost all young parents in Noida must be sending their children in private schools. Every sector of Noida is having a good private school. It is unlikely that anyone except from the very menial workers such as maids and cart pullers send one’s child in government schools.

IMG_0202 IMG_0211

 IMG_0205 IMG_0213

IMG_0207 IMG_0206

The elementary school in US covers KG to class V. Rakesh and Alpana took us through the carnival, that didn’t have anything unusual. However, the book fair was a unique idea. There was a section where a parent could buy the books for the class teachers of their kids. Moreover, the fair makes it easy for the children to get exposed, attracted and interested in books. The school was closed. But I could see some part of school. The creativity center, science centre, and the beds for plantation made me feel happy and excited. Even in this totally urban population, the school tries to make the kids plant some flowers or teach its need. The science centre imparts basic science knowledge through models and easy to carry out experiments. The creativity centre provides the means to find out the special interest in the pupils. I wish India could emulate the concept of creativity centers in every school. I don’t think it means a lot of investment. The education must provide facilities to identify and further the latent creativity in every student. I could find the website of the school that provides interesting information.

All the while I was thinking about the public schools in India. Yamuna was associated with one in our own sector that is maintained by Noida Authority. I can’t draw any comparison. Media of both the countries express concerns about the poor rather miserably poor condition of government schools. In US, parents keep a watch of the locality with better public schools based on ratings that are easily available through Internet and shift. Perhaps, in India too, a system of rating system of all the schools by an independent authority must start to help the parents.

Rakesh feels the American system is pretty good. In a chapter on American Power in ‘The Post-American World’, Fareed Zakaria writes, ‘it (American education system) is much better at developing the critical faculties of mind, which is what you need to succeed in life. Other educational systems teach you to take tests; the American system teaches you to think. It is surely this quality that goes some way in explaining why America produces so many entrepreneurs, inventors, and risk takers. It’s America, not Japan that produces dozens of Nobel Prize winners.” US certainly gives a lot of importance to education.US is going to invest $18 billion to overhaul of the nation’s public education system over the next few years. It was clear during the campaign and even now. We are happy. We can dream a better future of our grand children, who are all American citizens by birth.

Posted in education | Leave a comment

IIMs-Are They The Best?

RC Bharagava has recently made certain very relevant remarks about what and how IIMs are manufacturing management graduates. IIMs attract the best brains of India that include engineers, doctors, accountants, arts, science, and commerce graduates and even some from those selected in administrative services. Even hordes of IITians after getting the specialized training and knowledge of engineering join IIMs. Unfortunately, most of the students are without any work experiences. I am one of the many who disapprove this.

I have written many times about it. I earnestly appeal the industrial bodies such as CII, FICII and others to discourage this practice. It results in the diversion of the best lot to grow as generalists rather than as expert professionals such as engineers, architects and doctors.

RCBhargava was the CEO of Maruti Ltd. And as it seems, he is still the chairman of Maruti Suzuki, though it has become a Japanese company after it bought the majority of the share from the Indian government. He has a very strong and genuine concern and suggests that the IIMs must create and use Indian case studies instead of taking them from foreign universities such as Harvard. Interestingly, Mr. Bharagava heads a recent IIM Review Committee set up by the Centre. His viewpoints are pertinent: “India is a big enough country. So why are we not creating material out of the Indian experience? If there are no sufficient Indian case studies, how do you teach and create managers who are relevant to our business context?”

According to him, not a single “really good” case study of even Maruti had emanated from the IIMs. “Somebody has done a little bit here and somebody a little bit there. That’s all.” It is strange, as we keep on hearing Harvard using Indian Railways, Mumbai Dabbawallas, FabIndia, and ITC’s e-Choupal for its case studies. Are the teachers in the management schools negligent or complacent? Remunerations, some say, are poor. But can that be the reason when one selects teaching as profession?

According to Mr.. Bharagava, Management teachers are having so strong an obsession for teaching western business models in B-schools that nobody even mentions, let alone teaches a course, about Japanese management practices. “Students aren’t really told how the Japanese built up their industry after the war and the management systems developed by their firms.” Who can deny the mastery of Japanese of manufacturing management? It is the Japanese who produce better than six-sigma quality standard without following that practice. Surprisingly, the whole of West and US has started learning and following Japanese management system. Indian industry has got the maximum benefit out of it with many Deming Prizes with it. Only when the West adopts the Japanese management systems, some of it comes back to the teachers of IIMs. Tata Motors and Ratan Tata’s Nano can get globally accepted, but IIMs will not consider that a subject of case study to teach innovation in it courses.

The IIMs are not being able to attract good faculty, particularly in functional areas such as finance, marketing, organizational behaviour and strategy. Though research and creating knowledge was one of the missions of IIMs apart from running post-graduate management programmes, it hardly does any significant research. Media hardly covers IIMs but for the admission and placement details with spicy reports. People at large in India might have heard of CK Prahalad, Tarun Khanna and so many other management gurus of Indian origin who are reputed management thinkers in US. But hardly any of the professors of IIMs have published any books that are as popular as those by them.

IIMs produce very few PhDs and very few students find it attractive to come back as faculty. To Mr. Bharagava, Brand IIM has probably more to do with the quality of the students who enter through a ruthless process of selection rather than because of the contribution of teachers.

Posted in education | Leave a comment